2015 SCDTSEA Conference Highlights

Previous Image
Next Image

info heading

info content

2015 SCDTSEA Award Winners (Sponsored by AAA Carolinas)

Award Winner
Traffic Safety Officer of the Year Terry Taylor, SCDMV Office of the Inspector General, Supervisor

Administrator of the Year Dr. Christine Beyer, Driver Education Consultant to the SC Department of Education

Friend of Driver and Traffic Safety Education Sarah Clem, State Farm Safety Projects

Achiever of the Year Terecia Wilson, Research and Safety Consultant

Leadership of the Year Award Carol Hardin, National Driver Education Speaker

SCDTSEA Award David Smith, Mid Carolina High School

Commercial Driving School of the Year Budget Driving School

Commercial Driver Teacher of the Year Joe Sabbadino, Sabbadino Driving School

Driver Education Teacher of the Year Robbie Wiggins, Clover High School

Seat Belt Poster Contest (Sponsored by State Farm) 1st Place, Judah Smith, Sabbadino Driving School LLC, Taylors ($300)
2nd Place, Kylie Watts, Sabbadino Driving School LLC, Taylors ($200)
3rd Place, Joseph Calamia, Sabbadino Driving School LLC, Taylors ($100)

Parent-Teen Driving Agreements

This post contains links to some parent/teen driving agreements.

Click here to view an agreement created by the Allstate Foundation.

Click here to view an agreement written by Doreen Haughton-James of www.123DriveDrivingAcademy.com.

Click here to view an agreement written by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention.

Click here to view the parent-teen agreement used by AAA Carolinas.

Click here to view the family agreement used by Sabbadino Driving School.

SCDTSEA Driver and Traffic Safety Teacher’s Creed

We, the driver educators of South Carolina, do hereby dedicate our personal and professional efforts as teachers:

  • To effectively alert our students of the increasing hazards of operation a motor vehicle
  • To increase the decision-making skills of our students, relative to the effects of alcohol, drugs, and the student’s individual value system
  • To instill the traits of character that should make one a safe driver and good traffic citizen, such as respect for the rights of other drivers, obedience to laws and maintaining self-control
  • To keep abreast of changes in the field of driver education and traffic safety
  • To be constantly aware of the physical, mental, and emotional health and growth of our students
  • To work as a team in respecting the rights, the integrity, and the dignity of our fellow educators
  • To keep ever in mind our common goal to reduce the accidents and fatalities in our cities, state, and nation.

Proposal to Have Driver Education and Driver Training Under One Agency

A critical need in our state’s driver education and driver training programs today is a strengthening of the teacher selection, preparation, certification process, performance of the teacher, and structured learning experiences. The best way to search for ways to improve the instructional program is to have everything under one agency.

During the Southeast Region ADTSEA Conference, it was learned that all of the above is under one agency in Georgia and that the standards for teacher preparation and teaching courses are also same for high school and commercial school. In South Carolina the above is done by both the Department of Education and the Department of Motor Vehicles. The standards and regulations are also different in South Carolina.

A person can prepare to become a teacher in commercial school by taking 40 hours of instruction by a teacher without a college degree; to prepare to teach in high school a person needs a degree and 12 hours credit in driver and traffic safety education. A person can teach the full eight hours of commercial classroom driver education in a one day setting; to teach the full 30 hours of high school classroom driver education, it would have to be in a day’s hour or hour and half classroom sitting until the 30 hours are done. High school and commercial school both have to teach six hours of behind-the-wheel instruction, but there is no curriculum guide or mandate of what is to be taught. The Department of Education recently allowed driver education to be dropped if local school officials wanted it to be so (used to have a mandate that driver education had to be offered in each high school). All driving educators in high school or commercial school is certified by the SC Department of Motor Vehicles.

Perhaps a committee ought to be set up to study this further. It would be good to have a safety colleague or two from SCDTSEA to also be on such a committee. Maybe even take a survey of what other states are doing and what is working the best.

The desire is to see attempts for better quality teacher preparation and teaching measures for everyone involved in teacher driver and traffic safety education. More resources are needed to provide better standardization and supervision. One agency to be responsible for this tremendous task seems to be part of the answer.

Thank you for your consideration to improve the above situations. Please let us know of any attempts to this endeavor.

Joe Sabbadino

Addendum to SC Needs a Tough Texting Law

The desire is to share additional information to ban texting while driving. We shared earlier that Georgia’s texting law includes a $150 fine and 1 driving record point penalty. We feel more information about the Georgia’s law can be helpful.

According to national studies, approximately 22 percent of all crashes and 16 percent of all fatal crashes were caused by some form of distraction occurring within three seconds of the crash. A Georgia survey was given to drivers. Thirty-seven percent of drivers admitted to texting while driving.

Georgia also knew that studies compare the distraction caused by cell phones use to the slower reaction times of an impaired driver, and that the number one responsibility behind the wheel is paying attention to the roadway.

Effective July 1, 2010, Georgia law states that no person who is 18 years of age or who has a license shall operate a motor vehicle on any public road or highway of this state while using a wireless telecommunications device. Under this law drivers cannot write, send, or read a text message, email, or use the internet on any wireless device while driving. This includes texting at red lights or turn lanes. The rare exceptions are reserved for reporting crimes, accidents and emergencies. Prohibited behavior and texting during a crash would double the fine.

May this additional information be helpful to you. You can also go to www.gahighwaysafety.org.

Joe Sabbadino

Consider Texting Information To Pass Texting Bill

With distracted driving now playing a part in 80 percent of all car crashes, according to a recent Virginia Tech study, and responsible for some 5,500 automotive fatalities annually, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, the problem of mobile phone use for texting and talking behind the wheel has become and epidemic.

Distracted driving comes in various forms, such as cell phone use, texting while driving, eating, drinking, talking with passengers, as well as using in-vehicle technologies and portable electronic devices. Any non-driving activity a person engages in that has the potential to distract him or her from the primary task of driving and increases the risk of crashing is a distraction. There are three main types of distraction:

  • Visual – taking your eyes off the road
  • Manual – taking your hands off the wheel
  • Cognitive – taking your mind off what you are doing.

While all distractions can endanger drivers’ safety, texting is the most alarming because it involves all three types of distraction. Sending or reading a text takes your eyes off the road for up to 4.6 seconds. At 55 mph, that’s like driving the length of an entire football field!

A new On Your Side survey by Nationwide showed that eight in 10 drivers support some type of cell phone usage restriction. More findings to consider follows: Distraction from cell phone use while driving (hand held or hands free) extends a driver’s reaction as much as having a blood alcohol concentration at the legal limit of .08 percent (University of Utah). The No. 1 source of driver inattention is use of a wireless device (Virginia TEch/NHTSA). Drivers that use cell phones are four times as likely to get into crashes serious enough to injure themselves (NHTSA, Insurance Institute for Highway Safety). Driving while using a cell phone reduces the amount of brain activity associated with driving by 37 percent (Carnegie Mellon).

May some of the information within help you to approve the House’s texting bill that you are considering. A good law with tough enforcement can help to reduce deadly distracted driving behavior. It has been said that personal liberty ends where public safety begins.

Joe Sabbadino